How convenient we got an outbreak of a disease not even one year later. An event that was moreover dry-ran in a simulation some months before:



"Just a coincidence here, people, nothing to see, just move on". I mean, they are not even ashamed of it anymore. In their megalomaniacal mind they might even think they are doing the planet a favor. One way or another -- psychopaths or megalomaniacs -- I am sure they give each other coveted prizes for political achievements.

And, anyway, teh European Commission starts its reasoning from teh false premise that influenza-like diseases (that corona is) are preventable by vaccination. They aren't because they are single-stranded RNA viruses in contrast to really preventable double-stranded DNA diseases like smallpox. RNA viruses mutate very fast, too fast for any vaccination to be effective. As we have seen for other influenza viruses. Assuming that the European Commission knows what it is doing -- and it is not mere incompetence -- they can only be labelled as megalomaniacal control freaks.

They had a plan to 'flatten-the-curve' by lockdowns, which, at first seems logical, is also nonsense, because it will not avoid a single case of infection, it merely flattens and stretches the curve, teh integral would be the same (as shown in last week's edition of EN):


It would have made sense if it was to avoid overburdening the health system. But for sure that was not the reason, because
1) The health system was never overburdened
2) Investing rapidly and heavily in the health system would be economically better than wrecking the economy by lockdowns. Instead, millions of people in healthcare sector lost their job for lack of work!
"As Hospitals Lose Revenue, More Than A Million Health Care Workers Lose Jobs"
3) They would have stopped the lockdowns when the curve dropped too much (see green curve above)
After the curves went down, suddenly the narrative changed to "until the virus has been eradicated from the known universe". It shows the measures were to test your obedience and had no positive health effects anywhere.

And how bad will the economical measures hit the world? Bad. Very bad. Directly, simply by loss of production, about 12 thousand people will die in teh world every day. That toll is much higher than any CoFlu19 toll.

It is to be expected that we will get a second wave and a new lockdown. Just to beat your resistance into pulp. If not the same virus, then a new virus. And probably a much worse one. Imagine our luck, to get hit by two super-deadly viruses within one year. Well, if you understand teh world, you'd know the odds are ... about 100%

Throw in the word 'scientist' and everybody is convinced, even though no science is involved anywhere, only data manipulation. (Ask them a simple question what hypothesis was faslified!)

Well, let's ask teh experts, how many people were saved by lockdowns? None!
"Nobel Prize winner [Michael Levitt]: Coronavirus lockdowns cost lives instead of saving them"
"Coronavirus: Why everyone was wrong" (Beda M Stadler, former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern). Genau so!
"600 Physicians Say Lockdowns Are A ‘Mass Casualty Incident’"
Meaning, if you give support to these psychopaths in government, you are abetting genocide. It is as simple as that!
In any case, people have the right to believe what they want. They can lock themselves down as much as they want. They can quit their jobs, starving at home, or ask for help from philanthropists. They can stick to the TV watching fear-pandering idiots all day. What they cannot do is demanding others to believe the same, force them at home, and confiscate the fruit of their work. You cannot take people's freedoms away. Some 200 years ago there was a country that separated itself from feudal overlords, and said under the motto "No taxation without representation", or the better phrase (by Founding Father Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775)